Train capacity will be increased to meet the extra demand for Everton’s first match at their new waterfront stadium at the Bramley-Moore Dock next season.
With the fixture list for the Premier League 2025/26 season released on Wednesday, fans were quick to mark August 23 on their calendars. The Toffees will host Brighton & Hove Albion in the first official fixture at the Hill Dickinson Stadium following their move from the historic Goodison Park.
To cope with the increased demand for passengers on that route, Liverpool City Region Mayor Steve Rotheram has promised to double some Merseyrail services. Fans faced transportation issues during the test events at the 52,888-seater stadium. Large crowds had also gathered at the relatively smaller Sandhills station, which could create a “dangerous situation.”
“There were problems with people hours before trying to get into town and we only had four carriage trains on,” Mr Rotheram said.
“So there will be eight carriages from an earlier start.”
Everton’s first match at their new stadium will also coincide with International Beatles Week. Thousands of Beatles fans are expected to pour in from across the world to celebrate the legacy of the iconic group and gigs have also been planned at the historic Cavern Club, the birthplace of the Beatles and at The Pier Head, all just a mile away from the stadium.
The Mayor also urged the fans to walk from the city centre or from other nearby Merseyrail stations in order to abate the situation at Sandhills.
“We need to use Bank Hall more, we need to use James St more and potentially even Moorfields more,” he said.
“We are hoping that as people find their own pattern of behaviour, because that’s what happens with football fans, that they will perhaps come into town, find a pub that they want, and then people will take their own time and get there in plenty of time for the kick-off.”
A fan management zone could also be set up close to the stadium, which will help with the increased footfall and would “help to ensure that people can arrive safely and leave in a safe manner”.
Reader Comments (26)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
Benjamin Dyke
1 Posted
19/06/2025 at
15:02:56
Everything gives off a feel that no one on the council has really got to grips with it and the strategy sounds a bit like “let’s just hope everyone walks there”.
Paul Kossoff
2 Posted
19/06/2025 at
15:46:56
If it was the other lot, the council would have bent over backwards to help them. No amount would have been too great for the red shite.
The recent conclusion about the location of BMD was that it should never have been built there. I said when the site was chosen that it was not suitable because it’s only one way in, and one way out.
Building it right next to a major transport link (not suited for pedestrians) was madness. We will see when the test event takes place, just how difficult or easy to get in and out.
The pedestrian links from town and along the river should have been built along with the stadium. Putting them in place after is ridiculous. The council should be embarrassed with the sheer lack of professionalism regarding fans getting to and from BMD safely.
Now telling fans not to use Sandhills station, unbelievable! Let’s hope all goes well with the test event, but it will not be with anything the council has done.
Paul Hewitt
3 Posted
19/06/2025 at
15:59:23
I believe the council probably thought the stadium wouldn’t get built, so did nothing in way of the transport structure.
If the RS had built it, a new station would have been done.
Paul Hewitt
4 Posted
19/06/2025 at
16:00:29
Sorry Paul never read your post before I sent mine.
Paul Kossoff
5 Posted
19/06/2025 at
16:09:19
Plagiarism is a form of flattery, only joking! 😁
Jack Convery
6 Posted
19/06/2025 at
16:47:56
Put a ferry terminal near to the ground and establish a park and sail system on the Wirral. This will ease congestion, with less cars travelling through the tunnels, and increase revenue at the ground, as more people will have a shandy or two in the bars inside.
A new station nearer to the ground would help enormously. A couple of multistory car parks wouldn’t go amiss either. Maybe the club could acquire the land and build them, bringing more money in. It’s not rocket science, is it?
Danny O’Neill
7 Posted
19/06/2025 at
17:00:23
Unfortunately, that is common on the London Underground, arguably the most extensive transit system in the world, with trains every 2 minutes.
London has a population of 9 million residents. At certain times, with visitors, there are probably in excess of 15 million.
Hit the underground at rush hour on a good day, and you struggle to squeeze onto a carriage and often have to wait for the next one as the doors won’t close.
Pete Neilson
8 Posted
19/06/2025 at
17:01:22
Jack (6) as I remember it the initial plans included a multi storey but English Heritage objected and would have dragged the project out indefinitely. Not being satisfied with that plan being withdrawn they then campaigned for the whole Bramley Moore project to be denied. I expect many of the businesses in the area will open up their car parks on match days. Well find out pretty soon.
Paul Kossoff
9 Posted
19/06/2025 at
17:10:20
As you said, it’s not rocket science for someone to say, “Hang on, we need to plan for 50,000 fans getting in and out and to BMD before anything else is agreed on.”
Come to think of it, the people on the council are still apparently in the Stone Age, so rocket science hasn’t been invented for them yet.
Jack Convery
10 Posted
19/06/2025 at
18:16:11
Have a few day tripper boats with alcohol licences, to gently move Evertonians into the adjacent dock!
Les Callan
11 Posted
19/06/2025 at
18:53:14
Wouldn’t the question of car parking have been addressed when planning permission was applied for?
Neil Copeland
12 Posted
19/06/2025 at
19:02:48
So, based on the above perhaps LCC is fully aware of our local support…..
Peter Mills
13 Posted
19/06/2025 at
19:17:55
The majority of fans (including opposition supporters) trying to get through a small number of gaps in the dock wall. An inadequate rail provision, with a hopelessly small station.
The city narrowly avoided a disaster a few weeks ago. There is scope for mayhem.
Tony Abrahams
14 Posted
19/06/2025 at
19:23:50
With money from the government coming into the region to help with transport infrastructure, it will be very interesting to see how LCC, spend the money.
I’ve read people on ToffeeWeb, talking about a monorail, going right the way along the waterfront, and think that there could be a massive amount of money to be made by a private company if anyone invested in such a scheme.
I say this because there are a lot of residents living all the way along the waterfront now from this side of Otterspool, all the way to the soon to be developed Tabacco warehouses and this is only going to increase imo.
This plus a large percentage of the 52,888 going to Hill Dickinson Stadium every other week would I’m sure bring in a huge profit over time because of the demand. Even though I’m not sure how expensive it would be to develop, it would definitely be worth it in the long term.
Above all the mayhem you talk about Peter, it’s the exit points that are the biggest concern to me right now, mate, because I got a weird feeling when I look at those walls that they would have definitely been moved if they weren’t listed.
John Raftery
15 Posted
19/06/2025 at
19:29:20
If car parking provision was addressed during planning, it was simply to note there won’t be any. The Council wanted to make a virtue of green transport provision.
That would be fine if public transport was up to scratch. Plainly, as in the whole of the UK outside London, it isn’t.
Don Alexander
16 Posted
19/06/2025 at
19:34:28
Somebody/s have displayed mega recklessness and neglect in letting things get this far.
Never in the whole history of the docks have 50,000 people descended en masse to any part of them – not even when Mae West visited in late 1947!
Kev Johnson
17 Posted
19/06/2025 at
19:42:09
As someone who worked in editorial for years and years, I should know – and I do.
Like I said, 100% poo.
Dennis Stevens
18 Posted
19/06/2025 at
19:52:25
I’d go for “Transport Mayhem — Forever!”
Mike Gaynes
19 Posted
19/06/2025 at
20:03:09
Anjishnu is a young writer learning his craft, and I give him credit for not falling into the common online practice of “clickbait” headlines that attract eyeballs at the expense of accuracy.
Anjishnu may be a bit ponderous with his phrasing (okay, maybe more than a bit), but he’s scrupulous. He’ll get better.
Ged Simpson
20 Posted
19/06/2025 at
20:18:04
And from another J, Mike. Agree.
Dennis Stevens
21 Posted
19/06/2025 at
20:22:22
Perhaps I should add, in light of recent comments, that I am not a journalist – of any kind at all.
Brent Stephens
22 Posted
19/06/2025 at
20:30:25
Mike #19 – nice touch.
Geoff Cadman
23 Posted
19/06/2025 at
20:42:27
I use Merseyrail every home game and catch the soccer bus from Sandhills. I was given a preview of what to expect with the early kick-off on Grand National day. We gave ourselves an extra half-hour travel time. When we arrived at the station for the 10:45 train ,it was delayed and did not arrive until 11:20. By this time, three 8-coach trains had passed on the way to Ormskirk.
When we finally boarded the train, it was packed and was still quite full with Everton fans after leaving Aintree. As we pulled into Walton, an announcement was made that the train was terminating and to leave the train.
The next train arrived around 10 minutes later. We decided to leave at Kirkdale and walked, reaching our seats just as the siren and Z-Cars sounded.
Tony Abrahams
24 Posted
19/06/2025 at
21:26:59
The new station would only feed the city centre for a few hours on match day and Sandhills could do what it always does and help feed people going elsewhere.
A monorail makes sense, another landing stage on the river makes sense. With the huge volume of people, I’m not sure how trackless trams would operate safely, but as everyone is repeatedly stating, we definitely need a lot more infrastructure, especially for those cold, wet days in winter that are definitely not for the faint-hearted if things don’t improve on the pitch
John Chambers
25 Posted
19/06/2025 at
21:55:36
And for those complaining about car parking Goodison isnt exactly overflowing with car parks. Stanley Park car park is about 3/4s of a mile and pretty much anything else is residential so people gamble on getting a ticket.
I am surprised that a Park and Ride from Stanley Park hasnt been proposed as a solution.Im sure over time some of the local wasteland or entrepeneural businesses with parking facilities near BMD will offer parking.
Another option is we turn the fan plaza into a mass parking lot for electric scooters and we can whizz into town on those
Bill Watson
26 Posted
20/06/2025 at
01:39:21
The long term Merseyrail strategy included building a new station roughly between the Titanic Hotel and the new stadium but this was quietly dropped about 10 years ago.
Current bus services between town and the north docks is non existent. I think there’s one bus a DAY along Great Howard Street and none along Regent Road.
Monorails, trams and ferries are a non starter because of the initial capital outlay for a service which would only really be used for around a maximum of 50 games and events a year.
After the fiasco following the first test event Rotheram was panicked into coming up with the plan for a bridge over the station, to the northern platform. Work has yet to start but even if it began now it would take months to build.
Rotheram is obsessed with the ridiculous bendy buses as the solution to link the city centre to the football grounds and the airport. Meanwhile, Andy Burnham has secured funding to extend the MCR tram network to Stockport!
Fiddling around with Sandhills won’t solve the problem. The station is too small and that’s it. The only real solution is to build a new station nearer to the stadium.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW
© ToffeeWeb
Source link
Add Comment