28 Years Later: The Bone Temple won’t arrive in theaters until next month, but Sony Pictures Entertainment sounds quite excited by the sequel’s reception, as they are set to move forward with the third chapter in the 28 Years Later trilogy. Additionally, while original star Cillian Murphy is set to appear in The Bone Temple, he’s also expected to return for the third chapter. Original writer Alex Garland will be writing the script for the upcoming trilogy capper, and while no director is officially attached, Danny Boyle previously teased he was interested in returning to the series, after handing the series over to Nia DaCosta for Bone Temple.
Deadline reported the update on the trilogy, pointing out that an early screening of The Bone Temple resulted in a strong response from audiences, seemingly cementing the potential of the franchise. The completion of the 28 Years Later franchise is an exciting enough affair, and if we get a reunion between Murphy and Boyle, that’ll make the experience all the more thrilling.
A growing and worrying trend in Hollywood is the announcement of projects that will have multiple installments that will take multiple years to make good on, and when early entries stumble, studios and filmmakers have to reevaluate how to pay off the various things they’ve teased both behind the scenes and in-world. This year’s 28 Years Later was a shock in its own right, as it came nearly two decades after the previous entry, 28 Weeks Later, and brought Boyle back into the franchise. Its mere existence was a surprise, and at 89% positive reviews on aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, its critical acclaim was even more shocking. While some fans thought we’d have to wait until the release of Bone Temple to determine the future of the series, this new update is promising.
How ’28 Days Later’ Changed Everything
George A. Romero’s Night of the Living Dead took the concept of a “zombie,” which had been explored in a variety of inconsistent ways previously, and delivered a nightmarish adventure in 1968 that cemented tropes for the subgenre. His Dawn of the Dead and Day of the Dead continued the impressive mythology of this world (though the less said about his future zombie movies, the better), but it also inspired countless imitators, many of which fell far short of anything Romero offered. The slow, shambling nature of the ghouls and their human-like appearance meant these monsters served more as fodder than as anything intimidating, especially due to how many low-budget movies would just throw some makeup on a performer and call it a “zombie.”
Boyle and Garland weren’t the first filmmakers to wonder, “What would a zombie movie look like if the zombies were fast?” but the many effective sequences of terror caused by mindless monsters showed how effective a zombie could be if you tweak expectations. Some fans will argue the movie isn’t technically a “zombie” movie, because the monsters aren’t the undead come back to life, but rather are figures infected by a rage virus, though these are just narrative semantics.
In addition to ambitious narrative experiments, Boyle embraced emerging tech to shoot 28 Days Later on digital, creating a creepy, home video look, and his guerilla-style filmmaking of capturing barren streets of London (as he didn’t require complicated setups or a large crew) conveyed the real tragedy of waking up from a coma to find yourself in a wasteland. Luckily, digital cameras have come a long way since 2002 and 28 Years Later looks markedly better than the original movie.
Source link
Add Comment